Journal Information

Decision Support Systems (DSS)

CCF: C Impact Factor: 7.5
Please Login to view website of journal
Free account: view official websites, track deadlines, and get email reminders.
Register Login
Publisher:
Elsevier
ISSN:
0167-9236
Viewed:
37655
Tracked:
24
Something wrong with this page? Tell us
Get this via API
Search and ranking lists need no credentials at all; full detail for this page needs a free API key. See the developer guide.

Call For Papers

Decision Support Systems (DSS) is an academic journal published by Elsevier. (ISSN 0167-9236, impact factor 7.5, CCF C).

Aims & Scope and Electronic Commerce The common thread of articles published in Decision Support Systems is their relevance to theoretical and technical issues in the support of enhanced decision making. The areas addressed may include foundations, functionality, interfaces, implementation, impacts, and evaluation of decision support systems (DSSs). Manuscripts may draw from diverse methods and methodologies, including those from decision theory, economics, econometrics, statistics, computer supported cooperative work, data base management, linguistics, management science, mathematical modeling, operations management, cognitive science, psychology, user interface management, and others. However, a manuscript focused on direct contributions to any of these related areas should be submitted to an outlet appropriate to the specific area. Examples of research topics that would be appropriate for Decision Support Systems include the following: 1. DSS Foundations e.g. principles, concepts, and theories of enhanced decision making; formal languages and research methods enabling improvements in decision making. It is important that theory validation be carefully addressed. 2. DSS Functionality e.g. methods, tools, and techniques for developing thefunctional aspects of enhanced decision making; solver, model, and/or data management in DSSs; rule formulation and management in DSSs; DSS development and use in computer supported cooperative work, negotiation, research and product. 3. DSS Interfaces e.g. methods, tools, and techniques for designing and developing DSS interfaces; development, management, and presentation of knowledge in a DSS; coordination of a DSS's interface with its functionality. 4. DSS Implementation - experiences in DSS development and utilization; DSS management and updating; DSS instruction/training. A critical consideration must be how specific experiences provide more general implications. 5. DSS Evaluation and Impact e.g. evaluation metrics and processes; DSS impact on decision makers, organizational processes and performance.
Last updated by Admin Agent on

Special Issues

Special Issue on Extended Reality (XR) for Enhanced Decision Making and Organizational Transformation Submission Date: 2027-01-31 Guest editors: Dr. Hsiao-Hui Lee National Chengchi University E-mail: [email protected] Dr. Chih-Hung Peng National Taiwan University E-mail: [email protected] Dr. Choon Ling Sia City University of Hong Kong Email: [email protected] Associate Editors of the Special Issue Chao-Min Chiu, National Sun Yat-sen University, [email protected] Yen-Chun Chou, National Chengchi University, [email protected] Tsai-Hsin Chu, National Chiayi University, [email protected] Steven Hsiao, Rowan University, [email protected] Pei-Fang Hsu, National Tsing Hua University, [email protected] Ya-Han Hu, National Central University, [email protected] Chia‑Ying Li, National Sun Yat-sen University, [email protected] Dahui Li, College of Business, University of Colorado, [email protected] Yi-Ling Lin, National Chengchi University, [email protected] Ben Liu, City University of Hong Kong, [email protected] Qiqi Jiang, Copenhagen Business School, [email protected] Soumya Ray, National Tsing Hua University, [email protected] Siliang (Jack) Tong, Nanyang Technological University, [email protected] Yen-Yao Wang, Auburn University, [email protected] Melody Zou, University of Warwick [email protected] Special issue information: Extended Reality (XR) as immersive technologies – encompassing Virtual Reality (VR), Augmented Reality (AR), and Mixed Reality (MR) – is rapidly transforming how individuals, organizations, and societies interact with digital and physical environments. XR technologies create immersive, interactive, and context-rich environments where users can visualize data, collaborate across distances, simulate real-world scenarios, understand complex spatial relationships, and make more timely and informed decisions. They represent a key component of the accelerating convergence between the digital and physical worlds, where digital contents increasingly shape, augment, enrich, and even precede physical experiences. Recent technological advances in XR promise more impactful applications in domains such as manufacturing, healthcare, education, retail, logistics, engineering, smart cities, and digital twins. Although the engineering and computer science communities have produced substantial research on hardware and software of immersive systems, IS and decision-support research on XR – its design, adoption, usage, outcomes, and business implications – remains limited, despite its immense potential for managerial and organizational decision making. Recent discussions in the information systems literature (e.g., Chen 2024) highlight the importance of studying: devices and components with advanced technical capabilities, XR applications for myriad domains and purposes, implementation and usage of XR in various organizational and societal contexts, and short- and long-term outcomes and impacts of immersive technologies. As XR applications become increasingly data-driven, interactive, and intelligent (e.g., immersive analytics, spatial decision support, avatar-mediated collaboration), they open opportunities to rethink human–technology interactions, support complex decision-making tasks, and enhance performance across functional areas for organizational transformation. Given the mission of Decision Support Systems to publish cutting-edge research at the intersection of technology, data, and decision making, this Special Issue seeks to showcase high-quality quantitative (e.g., using analytical, empirical, and design science approaches) and qualitative research that meaningfully advances our understanding of XR and its role in supporting decision processes, improving organizational outcomes, and shaping future socio-technical ecosystems. Therefore, in this special issue we invite research that provides novel insights into XR-enabled decision making, applications, and impacts. Topics of interest include – but are not limited to – the following: 1. XR Systems, Design, and Technical Capabilities XR-enabled decision support systems Design and evaluation of immersive environments Interfaces, interaction modalities, and human–XR collaboration XR affordances, presence, immersion, and cognitive/affective states Data visualization, immersive analytics, and spatial analytics in XR XR integration with AI, IoT, digital twins, or blockchain 2. XR Applications in Organizational and Societal Domains Training, simulation, and learning using VR/AR/MR XR for field support, maintenance, and operations XR in healthcare, education, tourism, urban planning, and manufacturing Avatar-mediated communication, virtual teamwork, and collaboration Customer experience, service innovation, and XR-enabled commerce 3. Adoption, Implementation, Use, and Behavioral Dimensions Acceptance and use of XR at individual, group, organizational, or societal levels Task–technology fit, experiential engagement, and cognitive absorption in XR Factors shaping effective use of XR in work processes Cultural, demographic, or user-segment differences in XR adoption 4. Decision-Making Outcomes and Impacts Productivity, efficiency, and effectiveness gains from XR applications Organizational transformation and new business models enabled by XR Impacts on innovation, knowledge sharing, and decision quality Unintended consequences: distraction, over-reliance, privacy, security, ethics, well-being Metrics and methods for evaluating XR outcomes 5. Theoretical Innovation and Methodological Advancement New theories or theoretical extensions derived from XR phenomena Grounded theory, mixed methods, or action/design science approaches Cognitive, behavioral, and organizational mechanisms unique to immersive technologies Novel experimental or analytical approaches leveraging XR environments https://www.sciencedirect.com/special-issue/334253/extended-reality-xr-for-enhanced-decision-making-and-organizational-transformation
Last updated by Admin Agent on
Special Issue on Accountability in AI-Enabled Decision Support: Delegation, Oversight, and Decision Quality Submission Date: 2027-09-30 Guest editors: Xin (Robert) Luo, Hong Kong Metropolitan University, China Tingru Cui, University of Melbourne, Australia Kun Chen, Shenzhen University, China Special issue information: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in decision support systems, shaping decisions across a wide range of contexts including hiring, compliance review, financial risk assessment, healthcare triage, scheduling, resource allocation, fraud detection, service operations, and platform governance (Qin et al. 2023; Storey et al. 2024). As AI systems become more capable, they are no longer limited to supporting human judgment through data processing or prediction. Instead, decision-related tasks are increasingly delegated to AI, including information filtering, prioritization, classification, recommendation generation, monitoring, anomaly detection, and partial decision execution. These developments extend beyond formal organizational settings and are increasingly evident in everyday decision-making, community governance, and digitally mediated social interactions (Strunk et al. 2025). This growing delegation of decision work to AI raises a fundamental question for decision support research: how can accountability be maintained when decision-making is distributed across humans, AI systems, data infrastructures, and social and institutional arrangements? While accountability is frequently invoked in discussions of responsible AI, algorithmic governance, and digital ethics, its meaning remains fragmented and underdeveloped in research on AI-enabled decision support (Barocas and Boyd 2017; Diakopoulos 2016; Glikson and Woolley 2020). Prior work has advanced important insights into algorithmic decision-making, fairness, trust, transparency, and human-AI collaboration. However, comparatively less attention has been paid to accountability as a sociotechnical property that emerges across multiple levels, including individual judgment, community norms, and broader governance structures (Bansal et al. 2021; Storey et al. 2024). We propose this special issue to develop a decision support perspective on AI accountability. We define AI accountability in decision support as the sociotechnical capacity to assign, justify, monitor, review, and repair responsibility for decisions in which AI systems participate. This definition shifts attention from AI systems as isolated technical artifacts to the broader configurations through which AI-supported decisions are produced, interpreted, accepted, contested, overridden, escalated, documented, evaluated, and corrected. From this perspective, accountability is not merely a technical feature or regulatory requirement. It is a distributed capability embedded in system design, decision practices, social norms, and governance mechanisms that operate across individuals, communities, and institutional contexts. A central concern of this special issue is delegation. When decision-related tasks are delegated to AI, authority, expertise, discretion, and responsibility are reconfigured across human and machine actors (Baird and Maruping 2021; Liu et al. 2025). AI systems may be tasked with ranking applicants, identifying risks, detecting anomalies, recommending actions, or moderating digital content. These forms of delegation reshape how decisions are made and experienced, altering who is expected to identify errors, who has the authority to intervene, who must justify outcomes, and who is held responsible when decisions produce unintended consequences (Adam et al. 2024). Importantly, these dynamics unfold not only within formal institutions but also in distributed settings such as online communities, platform ecosystems, and everyday decision environments. This special issue therefore aims to explore how accountability can be designed, enacted, and evaluated in AI-enabled decision support systems across diverse contexts. How should decision right be allocated between humans and AI? How can oversight and intervention be meaningfully supported when AI systems influence or shape decisions? How can interfaces, interaction processes, and governance mechanisms enable responsible reliance while preserving human judgment? How can documentation, traceability, and feedback mechanisms support the identification of errors, the assignment of responsibility, and the improvement of future decisions? More broadly, how do accountability conditions influence trust, reliance, resistance, and decision quality in human-AI interaction? Prior DSS and IS research has examined important aspects of AI-enabled decision support, including algorithmic decision support in employee performance evaluation (Qin et al. 2023), AI-enabled credit scoring and financial inclusion (Li et al. 2024), human trust in AI (Glikson and Woolley 2020), human-AI team performance (Bansal et al. 2021), and the design of human-AI systems in decision sciences (Storey et al. 2024). Recent work has also highlighted the importance of understanding AI-enabled systems as organizational and sociotechnical arrangements rather than purely technical tools. Building on this foundation, the proposed special issue focuses specifically on how accountability is created, distributed, and sustained when AI systems become active participants in organizational decision-making. The proposed issue is strongly aligned with the aims and scope of Decision Support Systems because it directly contributes to core areas of decision support research, including system design, implementation, evaluation, behavioral foundations, organizational impact, and enhanced decision-making. It also provides a timely opportunity to extend decision support scholarships beyond traditional concerns with accuracy, efficiency, usability, and user acceptance toward a richer understanding of accountability in AI-mediated organizational decisions. This special issue welcomes rigorous empirical, conceptual, computational, design science, and mixed-method studies that examine how AI-enabled decision support systems can be designed, implemented, governed, and evaluated to support accountable decision-making. Relevant topics include, but are not limited to: conceptual foundations of accountability in AI-enabled decision support systems; delegation of decision tasks and decision rights to AI systems; allocation of authority and responsibility between humans and AI; human oversight, intervention, escalation, and override in AI-supported decisions; accountability mechanisms in AI-enabled DSS design; audit trails, documentation, responsibility tracking, and governance infrastructures; role-based accountability across users, managers, technical teams, vendors, regulators, and affected stakeholders; AI accountability in analytics, healthcare, finance, compliance, platform governance, public services, and operations; decision quality, fairness, trust, reliance, resistance, and organizational learning in AI-supported decisions; accountability pressures and their effects on human-AI collaboration; organizational consequences of AI delegation for work, authority, autonomy, and professional judgment; evaluation frameworks and metrics for accountable AI-enabled DSS; design science approaches to responsible and accountable AI-enabled decision support. By placing accountability and delegation at the center of AI-enabled decision support, this special issue aims to develop a coherent and distinctive research agenda for DSS scholarship. It will advance theoretical understanding of accountability in information systems, generate practical guidance for organizations deploying AI in decision-making, and provide design insights for building more responsible and effective decision support systems. More broadly, it will help IS and decision support researchers address one of the most pressing questions in contemporary AI-enabled organizing: not only whether AI can improve decisions, but also how organizations can remain responsible for the decisions that AI helps to shape. https://www.sciencedirect.com/special-issue/338112/accountability-in-ai-enabled-decision-support-delegation-oversight-and-decision-quality
Last updated by Admin Agent on

Related Journals

CCFFull NameImpact FactorPublisherISSN
Digital Social SciencesInnovative Insights (SMC-Private) Limited3078-4972
Journal of Decision SystemsTaylor & Francis1246-0125
Journal of Control and Decision1.8Taylor & Francis2330-7706
Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making7.4Springer1568-4539
International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making1.8World Scientific0219-6220
Engineering11.6Elsevier2095-8099
CKnowledge-Based Systems7.2Elsevier0950-7051
CFuture Generation Computer Systems5.9Elsevier0167-739X
CNeurocomputing6.5Elsevier0925-2312
CPattern Recognition Letters3.5Elsevier0167-8655

Related Conferences

Comments 0

No comments yet.

Please Login to post a comment