Conference Partner Index: Computer Graphics & Multimedia

Every conference we track, scored 0-100 from five published factors: recognition in CCF / ICORE / QUALIS, acceptance rate, number of editions held, community attention on Conference Partner, and how complete the public record is. 50 is the neutral baseline, not a failing grade.

Only conferences with an open call for papers

Conference Partner tracks 13 conferences in this list, last refreshed 2026-08-30.

Showing 1-13 of 13 items.
#CP-ICCFICOREShortFull NameSubmission
#8189.0BEurographicsAnnual Conference of the European Association for Computer Graphics2026-09-25 Due in 26 days
#30371.4AMMSysACM Multimedia Systems Conference2026-11-19 Due in 81 days
#40565.8CBPacificVisIEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium2026-11-08 Due in 70 days
#48662.7CISMInternational Symposium on Multimedia2026-09-01 Due in 2 days
#76855.6ICGIPInternational Conference on Graphics and Image Processing2026-09-05 Due in 6 days Extended
#81754.7WPMCInternational Symposium on Wireless Personal Multimedia Communications2026-09-02 Due in 3 days Extended
#88953.8GRIVAPPInternational Conference on Computer Graphics, Interaction, Visualization Theory and Applications2026-09-15 Due in 16 days
#99452.9ICMIPInternational Conference on Multimedia and Image Processing2026-10-05 Due in 36 days
#139550.4ICCGVInternational Conference on Computer Graphics and Virtuality2026-11-05 Due in 67 days
#270945.0ICCAIDInternational Conference on Computer Graphics, Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing2026-09-25 Due in 26 days
#292944.3AIVRVInternational Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Virtual Reality and Visualization2026-12-04 Due in 96 days
#304544.0 ICIMCISInternational Conference on Informatics, Multimedia, Cyber, and Information System2026-10-18 Due in 49 days
#347743.3 ICIMPACTInternational Conference on Intelligent Multimedia, Physical-AI, and Cyber-Technologies2026-10-01 Due in 32 days

How this score is calculated

The Conference Partner Index is computed from data already on this site, with published weights. It is not a peer-review judgement and it does not replace CCF, ICORE or QUALIS - where those catalogues cover a conference, their tier is the single largest input.

  • Academic recognition (35%) — The highest tier this conference holds in CCF, ICORE or QUALIS. We reproduce those catalogues, we do not second-guess them; a conference listed in none of the three is scored at the neutral baseline, not penalised.
  • Submission selectivity (20%) — Average acceptance rate over the most recent editions for which submitted and accepted paper counts are on record.
  • Editions held (20%) — How many editions the conference has demonstrably held, from the edition number plus the span of years for which we hold records.
  • Community attention (10%) — Distinct researchers on Conference Partner who follow this conference or opened its page in the past 24 months. This measures our own community - mostly computer-science researchers reading in Chinese - which is why we deliberately keep its weight low.
  • Public record completeness (15%) — How much of the public record is on file: official website, full call for papers, acceptance rates, best-paper records, past editions, and whether the latest edition is recent. This measures documentation, not academic quality. It is the one factor a verified organizer can raise directly, and the three biggest items - acceptance rates, past editions and best papers - are exactly the ones only the organizer can supply.

A missing factor is scored at the neutral baseline of 50 - never as zero - and lowers the confidence we publish next to the score. Read the full methodology · Algorithm version 1.1 · 5,646 conferences scored