会议信息

EAAI 2027: Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence

登录查看会议网址
免费注册:查看官网链接、跟踪截稿日期,并接收邮件提醒。
嵌入截止倒计时徽章
EAAI
用 API 获取这条数据
搜索与榜单列表完全无需凭证;本页的完整详情需要一把免费 API 密钥。详见开发者接入页
截稿日期:
2026-09-01 今天截止
通知日期:
2026-11-17
会议日期:
2027-02-21
会议地点:
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
届数:
17
浏览: 1014   关注: 0   参加: 0

会伴指数 (CP-I)

49.5 / 100
全站第 1,562 名 / 共 5,645 个会议 · 前 28%

人工智能与机器学习 第 154 / 734

学术认可 (35%) 无数据 —— 按中性基准 50 分计入
投稿选择性 (20%) 无数据 —— 按中性基准 50 分计入
会议传承 (20%)
78
社区关注 (10%)
12
资料公开度 (15%)
35

用到的输入: 有据可查的届次:17 · 过去 24 个月打开过本页的研究者:4 人

公开资料里还缺: 历年录用率 (+4.5) · 历届信息 (+3.0) · 最佳论文记录 (+2.3)
主办方认领本会议后,可直接在这一页补上;分数每晚重算。如何提升这个分数

置信度 45% —— 分数中有多大比例来自实际观测到的数据,而不是中性基准。 这个分数是怎么算出来的 · 查看完整榜单 · 算法版本 1.1 · 算于 2026-09-01

征稿

EAAI 2027 (Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence) is an academic conference held in Montreal, Quebec, Canada on 2027-02-21. The paper submission deadline is 2026-09-01. Acceptance notifications are sent on 2026-11-17.

About EAAI EAAI-27 invites AI education researchers and educators to share and discuss advances in teaching and learning about Artificial Intelligence, including the education and training of AI practitioners and users, defined broadly. The EAAI symposium provides a venue for teachers, educators, and researchers to share their innovative approaches to engaging students at all levels in learning about AI-related topics (e.g., search, logic, machine learning, natural language processing, computer vision, robotics, generative AI, AI ethics, AI literacy, AI safety, and others). Please note that submissions focused on the development, investigation, or use of AI to support teaching and learning of non-AI related topics (e.g., science, math, programming, reading, etc) are not within the scope of EAAI-27. EAAI-27 will focus on education about AI, rather than the use of AI to support education in other domains. We encourage authors of such work to consider submitting to the AAAI main track, IAAI-27 (co-located with AAAI-27), or (if running this year) the AI in Education workshop https://ai4ed.cc/. Submission Types EAAI-27 features the following tracks: Main Track, AI Education in K-12, and Model AI Assignments. All submissions are subject to double-blind review, and all accepted submissions will be presented at the symposium. Per AAAI policy, in-person presentations at the symposium are required. Main Track Chairs: Lisa Zhang (University of Toronto Mississauga), Bradford Mott (North Carolina State University), Gosia Migut (Delft University of Technology) The main track invites papers that contribute to advancing AI education and pedagogy: that is, the teaching and learning of Artificial Intelligence topics. We welcome contributions that advance AI education for a range of learners, including but not limited to future practitioners, undergraduates, graduate students, and the general public. Authors with submissions focused on K-12 educators or learners are encouraged to submit to the K-12 track. Submissions may be framed as research papers or as experience reports. Potential topics include: The design, implementation, and evaluation of AI curricula, courses, modules, or learning activities The design, development, and use of tools or resources for enhancing the teaching of and learning about AI The study of pedagogical, instructional, or mentoring techniques that support learning about AI The teaching and learning of generative AI concepts, tools, and technologies Each paper must be submitted to only one of the contribution areas outlined below. Papers will be reviewed for the area to which they are submitted and will not be moved between areas. Area 1: Education Research We invite submissions on research that advances teaching and learning of Artificial Intelligence topics. The hallmark of papers in this area is the presence of clearly articulated research questions or hypotheses, along with a rigorous evaluation to answer the questions. Submissions should draw on learning sciences or pedagogical theory to demonstrate how the work contributes to enhancing educational experiences in AI. Papers in this area will be evaluated based on the clarity of the research questions posed, the soundness of the approaches used to address these questions, and the overall significance of the contribution. Both qualitative and quantitative research are welcome. Area 2: Experience Report and Innovative Practice We invite submissions that share practical experiences, observations, insights, outcomes, and lessons learned in AI education. Papers in this area provide an opportunity for educators and researchers to describe the design, development, and use of AI education modules, approaches, or tools for teaching and learning about AI. Submissions should describe the context of use, the data collected, and, importantly, provide a rich reflection on what did or did not work and why. Contributions should be grounded in relevant literature, clearly articulate their novelty, and offer insights about the experience or tools presented that are valuable to the broader AI education community. AI Education in K-12 Track Chairs: Kate Moore (MIT), Amy Eguchi (UC San Diego), Henriikka Vartiainen (University of Eastern Finland) This track invites submissions focused on the teaching and learning of Artificial Intelligence topics specifically designed for K-12 learners and K-12 teachers. While this track shares an interest in both research and practice with Areas 1 and 2, it is distinctly oriented toward the unique challenges, contexts, and opportunities of K-12 education, including age-appropriate curriculum design, implementation in formal or informal educational spaces, and the development of resources that support K-12 AI literacy and teacher education focused on K-12 AI literacy. In addition to research papers and experience reports, this track solicits submissions on the design, development, and use of resources, curricula, tools, and interventions for K-12 AI education. Submissions should draw on learning sciences or pedagogical theory to substantiate claims about how the work advances educational experiences in AI or about AI — whether by shaping how concepts are introduced, scaffolding student understanding, or broadening access and participation. Quantitative and qualitative results are welcome where available, but are not required; submissions will be evaluated on the strength of their theoretical and/or pedagogical grounding, alignment of design (and implementation when possible) with learning objectives, and potential value to the K-12 AI education community. Submissions should follow the standard EAAI format for an academic paper and include, as appropriate: a description of the resource, curriculum, or intervention; the target age group and educational context; the required setup and resources; the AI concepts addressed; the expected learning outcomes; and, if available, implementation results. Special Track: Model AI Assignments Chair: Todd Neller (Gettysburg College) This special track invites assignments for AI classes for a range of learners. Good assignments take a lot of work to design. If an assignment you have developed may be useful to the broader AI education community, this track provides an opportunity to share it. Model AI Assignments are shared via a public online archive. Accepted Model AI Assignments must be presented in person at EAAI. This track has special submission instructions (http://modelai.gettysburg.edu). Review Criteria Submissions will be reviewed for: Relevance to the track Significance to the intended audience Engagement with prior work Novelty of contributions Technical soundness Clarity of presentation Evaluation of claims/results (as applicable) Engagement with questions of ethics/inclusivity (as applicable) For empirical studies, we suggest that authors consider making use of one of the reporting standards in the SIGSOFT Empirical Standards document (https://www2.sigsoft.org/EmpiricalStandards/docs/standards). This is not mandatory, and submissions not making use of the reporting standards will not be penalized. Notwithstanding, we always aim for high standards in empirical research. Specifically making use of the SIGSOFT Empirical Standards criteria allows us to hold all authors to the same high standards. Every paper is considered on its own merits, and we recognize that deviation from the guidelines may sometimes be desirable.
Dou Sun 最后更新于

相关会议

CCFICORECP-I简称全称截稿日期会议日期
40.7Artificial IntelligenceInternational Conference on Automation and Artificial Intelligence2022-06-012020-05-21
AA*92.4SIGIRInternational Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval2026-01-152026-07-20
AA*97.7AAAIAAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence2026-07-212027-02-16
AA*90.7CVPRIEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition2025-11-062026-06-03
BA*89.5ICRAInternational Conference on Robotics and Automation2026-09-152027-05-24
BA*94.0IJCAIInternational Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence2026-01-312026-08-15
AA*89.2STOCACM Symposium on Theory of Computing2025-11-042026-06-22
C87.1ICCInternational Conference on Communications2026-10-022027-05-30
CB62.5IJCNNInternational Joint Conference on Neural Networks2027-01-312027-06-14
B91.0ICASSPInternational Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing2026-09-162027-05-16

相关期刊

CCF全称影响因子出版商ISSN
CEngineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence9.0Elsevier0952-1976
Advances in Engineering Software5.7Elsevier0965-9978
Journal on Advances in Signal Processing1.9Springer3091-4507
AIEEE Transactions on Multimedia9.7IEEE1520-9210
CKnowledge-Based Systems7.2Elsevier0950-7051
BSoftware & Systems Modeling3.2Springer1619-1366
AIEEE Transactions on Computers3.8IEEE0018-9340
CFuture Generation Computer Systems5.9Elsevier0167-739X
CNeurocomputing6.5Elsevier0925-2312
CPattern Recognition Letters3.9Elsevier0167-8655

评论 0

暂无评论。

登录后发表评论