Conference Partner Index: Management & Social Sciences
Every conference we track, scored 0-100 from five published factors: recognition in CCF / ICORE / QUALIS, acceptance rate, number of editions held, community attention on Conference Partner, and how complete the public record is. 50 is the neutral baseline, not a failing grade.
Conference Partner tracks 8 conferences in this list, last refreshed 2026-08-30.
| # | CP-I | CCF | ICORE | Short | Full Name | Submission | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #130 | 84.7 | C | A | FC | International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security | 2026-09-17 Due in 18 days | |
| #1259 | 51.1 | MSIE | International Conference on Management Science and Industrial Engineering | 2026-11-30 Due in 92 days | |||
| #1736 | 48.6 | ICSCM | International Conference on Supply Chain Management | 2026-09-30 Due in 31 days | |||
| #1812 | 48.2 | FEMIB | International Conference on Finance, Economics, Management and IT Business | 2026-11-17 Due in 79 days | |||
| #2201 | 46.6 | C | ENTER | Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism | 2026-09-13 Due in 14 days | ||
| #3861 | 42.6 | LESCDT | International Conference on Logistics Engineering, Supply Chain, and Digital Transformation | 2026-08-31 Due tomorrow Extended | |||
| #4922 | 40.2 | AICSS | International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Computational Social Sciences | 2026-09-04 Due in 5 days | |||
| #5499 | 37.3 | BDAIEM | International Conference on Big Data, Artificial Intelligence and Economic Management | 2026-11-27 Due in 89 days |
How this score is calculated
The Conference Partner Index is computed from data already on this site, with published weights. It is not a peer-review judgement and it does not replace CCF, ICORE or QUALIS - where those catalogues cover a conference, their tier is the single largest input.
- Academic recognition (35%) — The highest tier this conference holds in CCF, ICORE or QUALIS. We reproduce those catalogues, we do not second-guess them; a conference listed in none of the three is scored at the neutral baseline, not penalised.
- Submission selectivity (20%) — Average acceptance rate over the most recent editions for which submitted and accepted paper counts are on record.
- Editions held (20%) — How many editions the conference has demonstrably held, from the edition number plus the span of years for which we hold records.
- Community attention (10%) — Distinct researchers on Conference Partner who follow this conference or opened its page in the past 24 months. This measures our own community - mostly computer-science researchers reading in Chinese - which is why we deliberately keep its weight low.
- Public record completeness (15%) — How much of the public record is on file: official website, full call for papers, acceptance rates, best-paper records, past editions, and whether the latest edition is recent. This measures documentation, not academic quality. It is the one factor a verified organizer can raise directly, and the three biggest items - acceptance rates, past editions and best papers - are exactly the ones only the organizer can supply.
A missing factor is scored at the neutral baseline of 50 - never as zero - and lowers the confidence we publish next to the score. Read the full methodology · Algorithm version 1.1 · 5,646 conferences scored